When the Patient Becomes the Threat
Workplace violence in Malaysian healthcare — and where compassion, professional duty and staff safety meet.
Cyberdoc — writing on medicine since 1995
Hospitals are places where frightened, sick and distressed people come for help. Pain, anxiety, uncertainty and long waits can produce anger.
Healthcare workers understand that.
But how much abuse should someone be expected to tolerate simply because they chose to work in healthcare?
That question became particularly topical in Malaysia this week. At the Hospital Staff and Patient Safety Conference in Kuala Lumpur on 15 September 2026, Association of Private Hospitals Malaysia (APHM) president Datuk Dr Kuljit Singh said hospitals could stop non-emergency treatment when patients behaved abusively or disruptively. He added an important qualification: an emergency is different. The statement raises a larger question about where healthcare should draw the line. The Star, 15 September 2026.
Violence doesn't always mean a punch
When we hear workplace violence, we tend to imagine physical assault.
In healthcare, much of it is less visible: shouting, insults, threats, intimidation and other forms of psychological aggression.
A Malaysian study involving 231 healthcare workers in emergency departments found that 38% had experienced workplace violence during the preceding six months. Among those affected, 88.9% experienced psychological violence. Sahiran, Minhat & Saliluddin, Journal of Health Research.
Another study of 136 doctors and nurses in a Kuala Lumpur public hospital reported workplace violence among 71.3% of respondents during the previous year. Verbal abuse was the most common form. Zainal, Rasdi & Saliluddin, 2018.
The studies involved different populations, settings and methods. Their percentages should not be interpreted as national prevalence estimates.
Sometimes the threat isn't the patient
The title of this article is deliberately imperfect. Sometimes the patient isn't the threat at all.
The Kuala Lumpur study found relatives and visitors were the most common perpetrators of verbal and physical violence. In the emergency-department study, more than half of the violence involved combinations of perpetrator types; relatives alone accounted for almost a quarter.
It is not difficult to understand how confrontation develops. Someone has waited hours with a sick child. A family does not understand why an elderly parent has not been admitted. A relative wants an answer the doctor cannot yet give. At the Kuala Lumpur conference, Ministry of Health Medical Development Division director Dr Nor Hayati Ibrahim identified waiting times as one factor that can trigger anger in government hospitals.
There is another important distinction. Aggressive behaviour may sometimes be caused by delirium, dementia, intoxication, hypoxia, neurological disease or psychiatric illness. Ministry of Health guidance recognises medical causes of aggression and emphasises assessment and de-escalation. MOH Guidelines on Management of Aggressive Patients.
A delirious patient striking a nurse and a relative deliberately threatening that nurse may create the same immediate safety problem. They are not necessarily the same clinical or behavioural problem.
The violence nobody reports
Perhaps the most revealing Malaysian finding is what happens afterwards.
A Melaka study involving 557 public-hospital healthcare workers who had experienced workplace violence during the preceding 12 months found that only 177 — 31.8% — reported it. Psychological violence was the most common form experienced. Minhat & Sahiran, Malaysian Family Physician, 2023.
Why so little reporting? The figures alone cannot tell us. But the degree of under-reporting raises another question: has some aggression become normalised as simply “part of the job”?
That possibility should concern us.
Where do we draw the line?
Healthcare workers inevitably deal with distress. A frightened patient needs patience. A grieving family needs compassion. An angry relative may need an explanation. A confused patient needs appropriate clinical care.
But none of this requires accepting threats or violence.
The recent APHM statement therefore raises a legitimate question: when does difficult behaviour become sufficiently abusive that non-emergency care cannot reasonably continue in the same way?
The precise professional and legal boundaries are more complicated than the headline suggests. APHM's statement should not itself be interpreted as establishing a general Malaysian legal rule.
What is clearer is what should happen before matters reach that point. Malaysia's Ministry of Health already has guidance covering recognition of aggression, assessment of underlying causes, de-escalation, security or police involvement when necessary, documentation, debriefing and incident reporting.
The issue is therefore not simply whether hospitals have policies. It is whether those policies work when somebody is actually being threatened.
Before anger becomes violence
For healthcare professionals: Recognise escalating behaviour early. Keep a safe distance and an exit route where possible, use calm and simple language, and call colleagues or security early. Consider whether agitation could have an underlying medical cause. Document and report threats or violence, and seek appropriate assessment and support after an incident. If there is an immediate threat, a weapon or serious physical aggression, personal safety and established security or emergency procedures take priority.
For patients and relatives: Fear, frustration and anger are understandable. If something is wrong, ask why. Ask for an explanation, request to speak to someone senior, seek a second opinion or make a formal complaint if necessary. But threats, intimidation and physical aggression do not improve care and can make an already difficult situation less safe.
You can challenge the care without threatening the caregiver.
Safety is part of care
The aim cannot be to turn hospitals into hostile environments or treat every raised voice as a security incident.
Patients should expect compassion, respect and safe medical care. Healthcare workers should be able to expect the same.
Hospitals will never be completely calm places. People will arrive frightened, hurting, grieving and sometimes angry. Managing that distress has always been part of medicine.
Abuse should not be.
Sources worth your time
The Star, 15 September 2026. Hospitals may halt non-emergency treatment for abusive patients, says medical fraternity.
Sahiran MN, Minhat HS, Saliluddin SM. Workplace violence among healthcare workers in the emergency departments in Malaysia. Journal of Health Research. 2022;36(4):663–672.
Zainal N, Rasdi I, Saliluddin SM. The risk factors of workplace violence among healthcare workers in public hospital. Malaysian Journal of Medicine and Health Sciences. 2018;14(SP2):120–127.
Minhat HS, Sahiran MN. Application of the theory of planned behaviour for predicting the determinants of workplace violence reporting behaviour among public hospital healthcare workers in Malaysia: a cross-sectional study. Malaysian Family Physician. 2023;18:61.
Ministry of Health Malaysia. Guidelines on Management of Aggressive Patients in Ministry of Health Facilities.
Dr Muruga Vadivale — “Cyberdoc”
Kerbside Consult · Vads Corner